<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology Classes or Technology in Math, Science, SS, and English LA Classes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoemap.edublogs.org/2009/05/10/technology-classes-or-technology-taught-with-math-science-ss-and-english-la/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoemap.edublogs.org/2009/05/10/technology-classes-or-technology-taught-with-math-science-ss-and-english-la/</link>
	<description>We are all teachers; we are all learners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:52:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Fowler</title>
		<link>http://shoemap.edublogs.org/2009/05/10/technology-classes-or-technology-taught-with-math-science-ss-and-english-la/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoemap.edublogs.org/?p=249#comment-183</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our philosophy is that computer skills should be taught at the same time as subject matter content.&quot;

This is also my philosophy since computers are really just classroom tools and should be used as such.  I see far too many teachers who don&#039;t view technology use this way.

&quot;Technology had to be readily available (and be in good working order), and both administrative and instructional support had to be in place.&quot;

This would be critical; if a teacher tries to use technology and it doesn&#039;t work the first time s/he uses it, many of them will not try again. Ever!  Important to have good hardware, software, training, and support in place.

I loved the golf analogy. It really works with technology, too. And I agree that sometimes we do need computer classes, but I, for one, am tired of let&#039;s learn word processing without a &quot;real world&quot; learning task to go with it.  I think the kids are, too!

Laurie from Tuscaloosa, AL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our philosophy is that computer skills should be taught at the same time as subject matter content.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is also my philosophy since computers are really just classroom tools and should be used as such.  I see far too many teachers who don&#8217;t view technology use this way.</p>
<p>&#8220;Technology had to be readily available (and be in good working order), and both administrative and instructional support had to be in place.&#8221;</p>
<p>This would be critical; if a teacher tries to use technology and it doesn&#8217;t work the first time s/he uses it, many of them will not try again. Ever!  Important to have good hardware, software, training, and support in place.</p>
<p>I loved the golf analogy. It really works with technology, too. And I agree that sometimes we do need computer classes, but I, for one, am tired of let&#8217;s learn word processing without a &#8220;real world&#8221; learning task to go with it.  I think the kids are, too!</p>
<p>Laurie from Tuscaloosa, AL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
